Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter20

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 41KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is January 24, 1977, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 20.

Just four days ago, on January 20, 1977, our nation witnessed the
crowning achievement of Rockefeller public relations propaganda, the
so-called People's Inaugural of Jimmy Carter. Through emotional
appeals to the American Dream, millions of Americans are being enticed
to let their hopes soar based on nothing but blind trust. But the most
crushing disappointments are always those which follow the brightest
hopes; and the false hopes that are being raised by Jimmy Carter will
come crashing to the ground all too soon.

Even so, there is something to be thankful for that deserves a
moment's reflection. Nelson Rockefeller still has been denied the goal
he has sought for so long--seizure of the Presidency and his
establishment as America's first openly visible Dictator. Never before
has a bright light been focused on the real plans and actions of
Nelson Rockefeller and his brothers; but now, after developing a total
of nine scenarios and back-up plans for placing himself in the Oval
Office through the back door of his 25th Amendment, he has run through
them all, and for the moment he has failed.

Major factors that have upset and delayed the plans of the Four
Rockefeller Brothers for total control have included such things as:
the twin Gold and Plutonium Scandal at Fort Knox which is still being
covered up, Indira Gandhi's crackdown on the CIA in the summer of
1975, and of course their double-cross by the Soviet Union that began
last summer with the planting of underwater nuclear missiles along our
shores. And according to my own Intelligence sources, the glare of the
truth has played an important role in keeping Nelson Rockefeller out
of the presidency, so far. In recent weeks, support for the leadership
of the Four Rockefeller Brothers among their corporate socialist
allies has been weakened by the shock of the Soviet double-cross.
Nelson finally abandoned his ninth take-over scenario involving the
Electoral College scheme under pressure from brother David. Thus,
David Rockefeller, the most powerful of the Four Brothers, is now
playing the role that their late uncle, Winthrop Aldrich, always used
to play in seeing to it that Nelson never became President.

What Nelson Rockefeller may do from this point onward remains to be
seen. Only one thing is for sure: Like the Soviets, he never gives up;
and he has not given up on his dream of becoming the President and
Dictator of the United States--and ultimately of the world.

But for the time being it is his brother David who is now
President-by-proxy through his control of Jimmy Carter. What we are
witnessing in the transition from the Ford to the Carter
Administration is nothing more than a changing of shifts in the one
real political party that runs America--the Rockefeller Party. The
Soviet Union is run decade after decade by fewer than one percent
(1%), who belong to the ruling Communist Party; and the United States
of America is now run decade after decade by fewer than 1%, who belong
to the ruling Rockefeller Party--whether they call themselves
Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, or Conservatives.

Jimmy Carter, who campaigned as a Washington outsider, owes his
come-from-nowhere election to the fact that David Rockefeller selected
him some years ago as the ideal puppet for his purposes. Carter was
invited to join David's TRILATERAL COMMISSION and was then steeped in
Trilateralist thinking--in other words, the Rockefeller line. With
such powerful support, Carter has no idea how dangerous a position he
is now in. Already a "Carter Watergate" is brewing to cut him down;
and, worst of all, the threat of war hangs over everything he does.

In his Inaugural Address, Carter expressed a preoccupation with war;
and for the past several weeks the American public has been under an
avalanche of warnings about the Soviet military threat, including
statements that the Soviets are now preparing for war. This is a
complete turnabout from the virtual ban on anti-Soviet news that was
in force in the controlled major media until very recently; and the
excuse that has been provided for all these new warnings is a new
study of Intelligence information that was launched last summer as
soon as it was learned that the Soviet Union was planting offensive
missiles in our waters. The threat of war, my friends, is very real;
but the intent of the controlled major media in relaying these
warnings to you now is another matter. We are now being
psychologically conditioned to accept a "Declaration of National
Emergency" when the time is ripe, and to submit to the dictatorial
controls it will impose.

The drive to merge the United States with the Soviet Union to form an
all-powerful World Government has already cost us two World Wars plus
Korea and Vietnam. Now, we are once again in a pre-war situation, on
the brink of NUCLEAR WAR ONE; and for reasons I can now reveal, the
Four Rockefeller Brothers still believe they can succeed in bending
the coming nuclear war to their own purposes.

My three special topics for today are:

Topic #1--HENRY FORD'S PARTING CRITICISM OF THE LARGEST FOUNDATION IN
THE WORLD

Topic #2--THE CURRENT PRE-WAR HOSTILITIES THAT ARE LEADING UP TO
NUCLEAR WAR ONE

Topic #3--THE GREAT SECRET RACE IN SUPER WEAPONS.

Topic #1--One year ago in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 8, I publicly
revealed for the very first time the supersecret White House merge
directive. Under this directive our lives in America are to be so
altered that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union. And
since last spring I have also been drawing your attention to the
little known but central role that the major tax-free Foundations have
played for two generations and more to push our nation in the same
direction.

Last month I was able to reveal one of my sources of information about
the Foundations--my friend, Mr. Norman Dodd, and to repeat for you his
own words about the clandestine role they have played in progressively
destroying the America that was created by our Founding Fathers. Mr.
Dodd's story is incredible, but it is also based upon painstaking,
carefully documented research which he directed with the Congress of
the United States. As one of America's foremost authorities on
Foundations, Norman Dodd is a man whose words carry a great deal of
weight. But since last April I have also been informed anew that there
is a contingent among the present-day Trustees of these Foundations
who are becoming increasingly worried about the direction in which
they are taking us. Even before the Soviet underwater missile crisis
materialized last summer, their fears of a Soviet double-cross were
mounting rapidly. And now, no less than Henry Ford II has resigned in
dissatisfaction as a Trustee of the biggest Foundation in the
world--the Ford Foundation; and he has warned in a criticizing letter
that a change in direction would be wise to consider.

In his resignation letter of January 11, 1977, he said in part, and I
quote:

"The Foundation exists and thrives on the fruits of our economic
system. The dividends of competitive enterprise make it all possible.
A significant portion of the abundance created by United States
business enables the Foundation and like institutions to carry on
their work. In effect, the Foundation is a creature of capitalism--a
statement that I am sure would be shocking to many professional staff
people in the field of philanthropy. It is hard to discern recognition
of this fact in anything the Foundation does. It is even more
difficult to find an understanding of this in many of the
institutions, particularly the universities, that are the
beneficiaries of the Foundation's grant programs."

Shortly thereafter he continues, and I quote:

"I am just suggesting to the Trustees and  the staff that the system
that makes the Foundation possible very probably is worth preserving.
Perhaps it's time for the Trustees and staff to examine the question
of our obligations to our economic system; and to consider how the
Foundation, as one of the system's most prominent offspring, might act
most wisely to strengthen an d improve its progenitor."

If you are not aware of the concerted drive toward collectivism that
has been promoted for decades by the major Foundations, these words of
Henry Ford II may surprise you. Even so, you may be even more
surprised at the reactions of the major Foundations to his criticisms.
Almost universally their bitterest reactions had to do with Ford's
defense of free competitive enterprise.

For example, consider the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
In AUDIO LETTER No. 19 last month you heard of the chilling role the
Carnegie Endowment has played since 1909 in altering America's
national life through warfare and twisting our education. When a high
official of the Carnegie Endowment was asked for his comments on Henry
Ford's letter of resignation, he reacted in the scornful words, "Is
that what the Ford Foundation is set up for--to promote free
enterprise?" He was very upset at the mention of free enterprise--the
indispensable foundation of Freedom itself.

Henry Ford II is not alone. Those Foundation trustees who insist upon
continuing the suicidal drive toward collectivism under the long-time
commitment for a One World Government are trying to put down all
dissent within their ranks. But Henry Ford II has courageously shown
the way, and we can hope for others to follow.

Topic #2--In all the major wars of this century involving the United
States, undeclared warfare has been a consistent pattern. In the cases
of Korea and Vietnam, in fact, the entire wars were undeclared. In the
cases of World Wars I and II, undeclared warfare and provocations
preceded the formal outbreak of war and marked the time period in each
case that has since been called "pre-war."

In that sense, we are now living in the pre-war days that are leading
up to NUCLEAR WAR ONE here in America! But as we are living out the
days of the pre-NUCLEAR WAR ONE period, undeclared hostilities have
reached a level unparalleled in the past.

Consider first the repeated plutonium cloud attacks which have been
mounted on the United States by Soviet submarines in recent months. As
I have related in previous monthly AUDIO LETTERS, the first such
attack was mounted in early October 1976 by Soviet submarines deployed
along the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf coasts of the United States.
Based on the results from that first full-scale experiment on our
country, Soviet chemical warfare specialists concluded that subsequent
plutonium cloud attacks could be mounted most efficiently from
stations along the Northwest Coast.

In late November 1976, a second experimental attack was mounted to
test this out; and while it was not completely successful from the
Soviet viewpoint, it provided all the additional data they needed.

Both of these experimental plutonium cloud attacks by the Soviet Union
were accompanied by convenient cover announcements by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA, to the effect that
radioactive clouds from Chinese nuclear blasts would be passing over
us. Thus an explanation was readily available should something
unexpectedly severe happen--but it did not.

And on December 13, 1976, as I reported last month, 21 Soviet
submarines loaded with plutonium poison to inject into our atmosphere
arrived on station along the Northwest Coast of the United States.
This time, my friends, experimentation was no longer the goal. Certain
individuals in the United States Government knew they were there, and
knew why, but did nothing whatsoever to interfere with their mission.

As of December 31, 1976, 13 of the 21 subs had emptied their load into
our atmosphere and headed out to sea, having timed their attack to
make optimum use of severe winter storm conditions across the United
States. The other 8 subs remained behind to reinforce the main
plutonium cloud by continuing to feed it periodically over a period of
days. Finally on January 3, 1977, these 8 Soviet subs also departed
out to sea, having emptied their loads into our atmosphere.

According to my own Intelligence sources, this third and latest
plutonium cloud attack by the Soviet Union was very effective. The
Soviets did achieve a very broad dispersal of the plutonium poison
throughout the continental United States. This, on top of the record
cold weather blanketing most of the United States lately, may well
lead to an outbreak of flu-like sicknesses in the near future, to
which the Government has been conditioning us now for nearly a year.

Undeclared warfare by the Soviet Union is also continuing by means of
the short-range underwater-launch missiles which have been planted in
our waters by the Soviet Union ready for use in a surprise attack.
Last month I revealed that 93 such missiles were in place in American
waters, and I gave the navigational coordinates for nine of them which
were surrounding the Island of Oahu, where Pearl Harbor is located.

I can now report that the United States Navy did remove all nine of
these missiles, completing the operation on December 31, 1976. But
four Soviet submarines were on hand to observe the complete missile
removal operation by our Navy; and as of January 17, just one week
ago, two new Soviet missiles were already in place, threatening Pearl
Harbor again. In addition, four other Soviet missiles have been
planted since I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 19 last month--two
in Alaskan waters, the other two on the West Coast. This brings the
total back up to 90 as of now.

My disclosures last month demonstrated to certain persons that I am
not bluffing, that the United States is indeed targeted by a massive
new round of Soviet underwater nuclear missiles. But for the reasons I
gave two months ago in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 18 for November,
1976, I do not intend to reveal the rest of the missile locations
merely to have them wasted in the deadly cat-and-mouse game now under
way. Instead, my own Intelligence sources have made it crystal clear
that only public exposure of the truth about this whole deadly matter
has any hope of stopping the coming war. For that reason I have
already launched efforts through a number of indirect channels which
lie outside the Rockefeller sphere of control in an attempt to bring
about this public exposure.

If full-fledged war does come, my friends, America is in for a wide
range of nasty military surprises. In certain areas Soviet approaches
to military technology are far different from our own--such as in the
field of anti-submarine warfare.

One field in which they are literally decades ahead of the United
States is in the area of microwaves as they affect human beings. Since
early December the Soviet Union has been conducting a major
experimental test program on a new satellite-based system that uses
microwaves to directly affect the behavior of humans. The test
victims: the crews of selected tankers and freighters in and near
American waters.

Soviet researchers discovered long ago that prolonged exposure to
microwaves, even at intensities considered "safe" in the United
States, can produce a long list of effects on people. These range from
dizziness and irritability to emotional instability and alteration of
brain wave patterns, as well as other effects. Starting from these
findings, Soviet scientists have developed microwave bombardment
techniques which have the basic effect of greatly reducing a person's
capacity for exercising judgment and fully comprehending facts at his
disposal. A person under such bombardment, in other words, is very
prone to make mistakes, serious mistakes.

On December 15, 1976, the Liberian tanker Argo Merchant went aground
on the Nantucket shoals off Cape Cod, and the resulting oil spill of
7-1/2 million gallons was the worst to date in American history. Many
things were strange about the incident--such as the fact that the
Nantucket shoals are a very well known navigational hazard, and the
Argo Merchant was many miles off course. Hearings later revealed that
the ship's navigational gear was not in proper condition, but strange
behavior by the crew itself went unexplained.

The Argo Merchant was then followed by a rash of tanker incidents in
and near American waters; and in almost eve ry case, errors of
judgment were either primary or contributing factors.

It was a bad month for the Coast Guard; but it was worst of all for
the 38 nationalist Chinese crewmen of the tanker Grand Zenith, which
was lost at sea off the New England coast with over 8-million gallons
of heavy fuel oil aboard. On December 30, 1976, the Zenith reported
its position as about 60 miles south of Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. It was
never heard from again. Several days later, after the ship failed to
arrive at its destination, the Coast Guard began a search for the
missing ship. However it was noticed that the last position reported
by the Zenith was so far north of its planned course that it did not
seem to make sense. As a result, the search was shifted to a seemingly
more likely area far to the south of that location.

The story of the Grand Zenith is a tragic one, my friends. But it
might have been less tragic had the Coast Guard taken the last
position report by the Captain of the Grand Zenith more seriously and
anchored search operations on that position, because on January 7,
1977, I received Intelligence information to the effect that the
location of the sunken Grand Zenith was approximately 43 degrees 5
minutes North, 67 degrees 52 minutes West. Furthermore, my information
indicated that as of that time there were still survivors in the
immediate vicinity of the sinking.

It was urgent that this be brought to the attention of the Coast Guard
without delay. The search had already been narrowed down to the wrong
area--over 200 miles to the southeast of the correct position--based
on the finding of two life jackets bearing the name Grand Zenith. I
immediately contacted the J. F. Moran Company in Providence, Rhode
Island (the ship's agent in New England), and gave them the
information. They passed it on to the Coast Guard--but there it
stopped!

For days I tried directly and indirectly to get someone to check out
the location I had been given. On January 10 I contacted the Coast
Guard directly to see what had been done. I was informed that no
attempt whatever had been made to check out my report, and that no
attempt was going to be made!! Instead the same fruitless area 300
miles east of Cape Cod was searched day after day for a week with no
hope whatsoever of finding the survivors. Meanwhile I could not
persuade the Coast Guard even to make a single flight over the actual
site of the sinking in order to check out my report.

The same information was also given to the Navy after the Coast Guard
refused to investigate; and the Navy, too, refused to check it out.
Had either the Navy or the Coast Guard checked the information I gave
them about the Grand Zenith, they would have found it to be true, and
that would have demonstrated to the public at large that my
Intelligence sources about matters like this are extremely accurate.

My Intelligence sources had hoped that this would be exactly the
outcome of my relaying the life-saving information about the Grand
Zenith. But, my friends, the TRUTH has many enemies.

Topic #3--The brain-scrambling microwave weapons which are now
entering operational status in the Soviet arsenal are just one example
of a whole new generation of superweapons which are now under
development in a secret arms race. The participants in this race are
none other than the Corporate Socialist Rockefeller cartel on the one
hand, and the State Socialists of the Soviet Union on the other. Thus,
while they are allies in the drive to take over the rest of the world,
there remains a tension of rivalry between the two. Each would like to
achieve clear supremacy over the other, and each is trying to prevent
the other from achieving such supremacy. Caught in the middle as both
pawn and prize is the United States of America with her people, her
resources, and her industrial and military establishment. We
continually hear about the military relationship between the Soviet
Union and the United States, but the real arms struggle is between the
Soviet Union and the Rockefeller empire--and it is a well kept secret.

Weapons which are under normal official Defense Department control in
this country are always compared with weapons which enjoy a similar
officially acknowledged status in the Soviet Union. Thus military
planners think in terms of Soviet Backfire Bombers versus the American
B-1 Bomber; Soviet missiles and missile-firing submarines versus their
counterparts; and new developments such as Cruise Missiles which, by
the way, are not actually a basic new concept at all. All of these
things are real and important factors in the military equation. But
there is another layer of weaponry that you have never heard about,
yet which is crucial to the real power balance between the Rockefeller
and Soviet empires. This is the realm of the secret arms race in
highly advanced super weapons. This realm is completely unaffected by
SALT treaties or other treaties, and involves a continual jockeying
for pure raw power!

Thus, for example, timid reports are just beginning to be made public
about the possibilities that lasers might be used to blind military
satellites, and that some day far in the future they might even be
developed into death rays like those of Science Fiction. As for
operational weapons in the supersecret category, the Soviet underwater
nuclear missiles that now infest our waters and the sonar-absorbing
mini-submarines which are used to plant them are good examples.

One of the puzzling things to me until recently was the incredible
"Red Friday Agreement" of October 1, 1976, whereby the Rockefeller
Brothers pledged, through President Ford, not to harass the Soviet
submarines planting missiles in our waters. Even more puzzling has
been the absence of a Soviet ultimatum or surprise attack so far,
given our heavy coastal targeting with these missiles. But now, I can
give you the answers.

When I first revealed the locations of Soviet underwater missiles
around the world in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 last August, I did so
with the knowledge that a planned world-wide Soviet surprise attack
was imminent, and that public exposure was the only thing that could
prevent it. Now I know more fully why the surprise element was so
crucial to the double-cross embarked upon by the Soviet Union. The
Soviets were trying to prepare and launch the attack before an awesome
weapons system that is under direct Rockefeller control could be
activated; but ever since that surprise was ruined, they have been
forced to bide their time while they watch for another opportunity to
catch the Rockefeller empire in a vulnerable moment.

Meanwhile a standoff is being maintained between the Soviet underwater
missiles and the Rockefeller superweapons system I am about to tell
you about. At the same time, Rockefeller propaganda is being used to
rapidly wash away the idea of East-West detente in a flood of warnings
about the Soviet threat and possible war. The purpose of it all is to
lead up to a "Declaration of National Emergency", as I have already
warned. Finally, NUCLEAR WAR ONE is programmed to come. The purpose of
the Rockefeller superweapons is not to prevent this war. These
superweapons are only a club over the head of the Soviets to insure
that the war goes according to plan. This includes Soviet adherence to
the "Nuclear Safe Zone" which was established by secret agreement to
protect the Rockefeller Brothers and their intimates.

I was first alerted to the existence of the Rockefeller superweapons
system as the result of my press release which was sent out to nearly
11,000 newspapers in the United States late in October in connection
with the release of monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17. The press release
called attention to the pivotal role General George S. Brown, Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had played in preventing a surprise
attack by means of Soviet underwater missiles.

On November 17, 1976, one of my associates received a call from a Mr.
Tony Hodges, a prominent environmentalist who lives in Honolulu. Mr.
Hodges had been given a copy of the press release, and called to find
out more about it. He had good reason to be interested because nearly
a year earlier , unbenoticed to my associates or myself, he had
delivered a 47-page warning document to the ambassadors of more than
50 countries who had signed the 1971 Seabeds Arms Control Treaty. In
this warning document Mr. Hodges alerted the reader to, quote:

"Probable violations by the USA and the USSR of the 1971 Seabeds Arms
Control Treaty."

He was careful to make clear that the material contained in the
document did not prove his suspicions that undersea weapons of the
sort banned by the treaty had been deployed by either the United
States or the Soviet Union. Nevertheless he did explain in
considerable detail why such weapons, such as missiles and undersea
silos, would be militarily desirable; and he also presented the
statements of several extremely highly qualified experts in this field
of technology contending that such undersea missile systems are
feasible.

One of these authorities is Dr. John P. Craven, who is presently (Jan.
1977) the dean of Marine Programs for the University of Hawaii as well
as Marine Affairs Coordinator for the State of Hawaii. Formerly he was
Chief Scientist on United States Navy projects which involved both the
development of this nation's submarine-launched ballistic missile
system and deep submersibles. He is also an attorney specializing in
Marine Law, and at last report continued to be a high-level consultant
to the Department of Defense.

In his warning document, Mr. Hodges lists the impressive credentials
of Dr. Craven in more detail, and also presents voluminous notes on a
conversation he had with Dr. Craven in November 1975 about the subject
of undersea missiles. The entire Craven interview as reported in the
Hodges warning document provides a great deal of insight into the
whole subject of undersea missiles, which are discussed throughout as
being sealed inside a protective capsule while they dwell in their
hiding places beneath the sea. At no point did Dr. Craven admit to
knowing of the actual existence of any such system; but according to
the report of Mr. Hodges, the feasibility of such undersea missiles
was strongly confirmed by Dr. Craven.

To illustrate this, I will now quote from page 26 of the Hodges
warning document--Notes C-29 through C-31, quote:

"Craven said he could develop a total weapons system to do what I
suggested in a maximum of four (4) years, longer if it needed to be
clandestine.

The above is an enormously important statement by Craven, since the
author believes that Craven was intimately involved in the development
of the systems noted in this warning document. The figure Craven gave
for carrying out the system development in total secrecy, such as has
been done, was seven (7) years. This is significant because it is
believed that the program to place nuclear weapons on and within the
seabed was begun in 1968 while Craven was still chief scientist of the
Navy's Strategic Systems project and its Deep Submergence Systems
project. The seabed silos and the tidal wave and earthquake-generating
systems would certainly fall in those two areas of responsibility of
his.

It should be noted that whenever during the conversation we got away
from whether or not the weapons system had actually been implanted,
Craven quickly warmed up to the subject as the 'can do' technologist
he is known to be. When he said he could develop such a program--a
'total weapons system' he called it--in only (4) years, he did so with
considerable gusto.

It was in this vein that Craven offered the next remark. Craven said
that the individual missile capsules did not have to be placed in
silos on the seabed, but could be dumped off the rear of a fast-moving
destroyer. Craven said that there would be some problem for the
missile to know its precise location, but that this could be worked
out."

The Hodges warning document also reports the assessment of feasibility
of underwater missiles by two other experts. One who is identified as
having worked for 16 years on American submarine-launched ballistic
missile projects is Robert C. Aldrich. He is quoted as saying, quote:

"Quite feasible, though I was skeptical at first."

Another person quoted is Costa Tpsis of MIT Center for International
Studies, a well known analyst of strategic missile systems. His
assessment of the feasibility of undersea missile systems, as
described by Hodges, is reported to be quote:

"'Absolutely possible.' Tpsis said that such silos could be placed on
the continental shelf in water as shallow as 100 meters and still
achieve the same protective purpose."

(End of quote from the Hodges warning document.)

My friends, Tony Hodges deserves a great deal of credit, both for the
importance of the material he uncovered and summarized in his warning
document, and for the way in which he has handled it. First, he tried
unsuccessfully to get the Government to take proper corrective
measures without having to resort to embarrassing publicity about it.
Then, he turned to the press in the person of a syndicated columnist,
whom I will simply call "Mr. X." Mr. X took great interest in the
Hodges warning document material and in the plan to have it delivered
to the governments of the signatories to the Seabed Arms Control
Treaty on December 17, 1975. According to Hodges, a big news story was
written ready to break on the same day the documents were
delivered--December 17, 1975. But suddenly Mr. X decided to kill the
story because CIA Director William Colby, National Security Council
Staff Director Brent Scowcroft, and Richard Chaney of the White House
Staff all asked him to kill it! Nevertheless the warning document was
delivered to the ambassadors of the Seabed Treaty signatories in
Washington and at the United Nations in New York City. According to
Mr. Hodges this, too, apparently fell on deaf ears. Nor have attempts
to bring it to the attention of the United States Congress apparently
been of any use!

But, my friends, Tony Hodges was on to something very big indeed.
Having been alerted for the first time by his warning document that
the United States might be involved in some way with undersea missiles
or other nuclear weapons, I began checking my own Intelligence sources
to find out whether it was actually so or not. And, my friends, the
answer is "Yes." The Hodges warning document provides a great deal of
very informative background material for what I am about to tell you;
and I am informed that as long as he has copies of it left, you can
obtain a copy for $10.00 by writing to him directly. The name and
address:

Mr. Anthony Hodges, 3238 Paty Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 His
telephone number now is: Area Code 808-988-2557.

What I have to tell you now, my friends, is not the responsibility of
Tony Hodges in any way. It is what I have learned from my own
Intelligence sources over the past two months, and I accept full
responsibility for making it public.

When I revealed the presence of Soviet short-range nuclear missiles in
our waters last August, I mentioned that the United States had not
placed similar missiles in the waters around the Soviet Union. I can
confirm once again that this is the case. But now, I have learned that
an entirely different kind of underwater-launch offensive nuclear
missiles are targeted on the Soviet Union from resting places deep in
the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

According to my own Intelligence information, only 14 of these
undersea supermissiles have been deployed--5 in the Pacific, 9 in the
Atlantic--but that's enough. Each of these encapsulated supermissiles
is more akin to the Saturn moon rocket than to any ordinary ICBM. Each
carries several dozen independently targetable hydrogen warheads.
Several of these on each missile are superyield warheads, with the
rest being similar to the normal Minuteman or Polaris warhead. The
superyield warheads are designed to devastate all the major ports and
key portions of the industrial heartland of the Soviet Union, in spite
of the Civil Defense measures that the Soviets have taken in recent
years. The huge number of lower-yield warheads are targeted on
relatively soft targets throughout the Soviet Union with the sole
purpose of raising the Soviet casualty toll as high as po ssible.

The whole purpose of these undersea supermissiles is to confront the
Soviet Union with a threat of massive counterattack which cannot be
neutralized in a Soviet first strike, and which would ruin the Soviet
Union as a functioning society. According to plan, these missiles
would virtually destroy the Soviet Union as a modern civilization,
killing over 100-million people in the process. But, my friends, the
purpose of these undersea supermissiles aimed at the Soviet Union is
not to protect you and me, nor to prevent war! They are under the
direct control of the Rockefeller Brothers by way of their controlled
CIA--not the normal chain of command through the Department of
Defense; and their purpose is to serve as an awesome club over the
heads of the Soviet rulers to make sure that NUCLEAR WAR ONE goes as
planned.

The world-wide Pearl Harbor attack that was imminent last August when
I publicly revealed the world-wide locations of Soviet underwater
missiles was a daring Soviet gamble. Its purpose was to eliminate the
Four Rockefeller Brothers from the scene and simultaneously prevent
the CIA undersea missiles from being launched by making such
counterattacks seem pointless. But the key ingredient of that plan was
secrecy and total surprise. My intelligence sources made it abundantly
clear last July and August that the only way to prevent immediate
nuclear disaster was public exposure of the truth. And now we know
why. Now we also know why the Four Rockefeller Brothers felt that they
could get away with the seemingly suicidal policy instituted on Red
Friday, October 1, 1976, agreeing to allow the Soviet Union to keep
planting short-range nuclear missiles in our territorial waters
without harassment. It's all part of a nuclear standoff involving
weapons the public does not even know about and in which the
Rockefellers believe they hold the upper hand.

There are now strong indications that the Four Rockefeller Brothers,
believing they still hold the upper hand with their undersea
supermissiles, plan to turn the presence of the Soviet missiles in our
waters to their own advantage. During the fall of 1976 they
re-established the strained alliance between themselves and the Soviet
Union for the time being; and now we are being built up rapidly to
accept a Declaration of National Emergency. The announcement by the
Government that there are Soviet missiles in our waters is now being
arranged to be done with the advanced knowledge of the Soviet Union.
Just as Franklin D. Roosevelt declared an "unlimited national
emergency" on May 27, 1941 as part of the build-up for war, a similar
scenario is being worked out now to trap us all!

But the cruel joke may be on the Rockefeller Brothers themselves, who
may yet be buried by the Soviet Union along with millions of us.
Something is going wrong with the CIA supermissiles deep in the ocean;
and as of now, one is completely disabled and five more are
deteriorating rapidly and probably are not usable. That leaves only
eight undersea supermissiles at the disposal of the Rockefeller
Brothers; and their reliability, too, is now open to serious question.
In addition, the Soviet fears about their corroding underwater
missiles in the secret Soviet missile crisis of 1971, which I
described in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14 last July, apply again now.
Several of the undersea supermissiles are now leaking plutonium from
their disabled warheads into the surrounding water, and the
possibility of an uncontrolled explosion cannot be ruled out. Should
this happen, tidal waves or earthquakes could be created that could
affect Hawaii, the Bahamas, or any place along the east coast from
Nova Scotia to Florida.

Just as my Intelligence sources emphasized last summer that public
exposure of the truth was the key to avoiding disaster, the same
situation exists again now. The CIA undersea supermissiles in the
Atlantic and Pacific cannot protect us from war, and in fact are not
even intended for that purpose. Yet they sit there as a present hazard
to all of our lives, directly and indirectly. Therefore I am going to
reveal the locations of all 14 of the CIA undersea supermissiles in
navigational coordinates. At a minimum I hope to strip the Rockefeller
cartel of their ace in the hole that makes our survival irrelevant to
them; but even more, I hope to undo their continued cooperation with
the Soviet Union in a plan to sacrifice millions of our lives. This
may well be our last chance to prevent the present "pre-war period"
from erupting as planned into NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

The missiles are located in water depths ranging from a few hundred
feet at several Atlantic sites to more than 15,000 feet at one Pacific
site.

The following five locations are in the Pacific Ocean. Incidentally,
these are in the vicinity of locations which are shown on a map in the
Hodges warning document as probable locations of undersea weapons. As
explained in the warning document, Mr. Hodges believes that these
locations were the subject of seabed weapons installations or tests by
the CIA-financed Howard Hughes mystery ship, the Glomar Explorer.

Pacific Missile No. 1--About 25 miles north of the Hawaiian Island
Kauai at 22-37-14 North, 159-21-55 West. Plutonium leakage from this
missile is badly contaminating the surrounding water.

Pacific Missile No. 2--About 10 miles north of Kauai at 22-21-59
North, 159-36-19 West. Leaking, but not as badly.

Pacific Missile No. 3--About 650 miles northwest of Christmas Island
at 9-20-0 North, 165-18-41 West.

Pacific Missile No. 4--About 550 miles northwest of Christmas Island
at 8-0-0 North, 163-34-38 West. This missile is totally disabled.

Pacific Missile No. 5--About 420 miles west-northwest of Christmas
Island at 3-2-0 North, 164-35-25 West.

Now for the Atlantic missiles:

Atlantic Missile No. 1--In Canadian waters near Sable Island at
43-52-0 North, 59-10-54 West.

Atlantic Missile No. 2--In Canadian waters about 140 miles
south-southeast of Halifax, Nova Scotia, at 42-30-24 North, 63-1-5
West.

Atlantic Missile No. 3--About 225 miles due east of Cape Cod at
41-46-23 North, 65-54-33 West.

Atlantic Missile No. 4--About 120 miles southeast of Cape Cod at
40-20-0 North, 68-18-32 West. Leaking.

Atlantic Missile No. 5--About 50 miles to the southwest of Atlantic
Missile No. 4 at 40-4-0 North, 69-17-27 West.

Atlantic Missile No. 6--Only about 30 miles southeast of Cape
Hatteras, North Carolina at 34-49-1 North, 75-17-27 West. Leaking.

Atlantic Missile No. 7--About 240 miles east-northeast of Charleston,
So. Car. at 33-5-40 North, 75-43-38 West.

Atlantic Missile No. 8--About 290 miles east-southeast of
Jacksonville, Fla. at 30-9-9 North, 77-8-44 West. Leaking.

And finally:

Atlantic Missile No. 9--In British waters about 100 miles
east-northeast of Nassau in the Bahamas at 25-19-21 North, 75-54-33
West.

In 1947 the Rockefeller Brothers arranged for the CIA to be created
for their own private purposes, and today it is the CIA--not the
normal military chain of command--that exercises control for the
Rockefellers over the undersea supermissiles as part of its expanding
encroachment into military affairs. This is helping to bring our
beloved country to agony and ruin, unless, my friends, WE stop it!

Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])